• Login
    View Item 
    •   Home
    • USI Theses, Capstones, Dissertations, and Projects
    • Theses
    • Master of Arts in English (MAE)
    • View Item
    •   Home
    • USI Theses, Capstones, Dissertations, and Projects
    • Theses
    • Master of Arts in English (MAE)
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.
    Skip to main content

    Browse

    All of SOAR USICommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Writing to learn for scientific literacy : a rhetoric and composition studies-based curriculum for introductory historical geology

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Wright, Carrie L.
    Advisor
    Lee, Melanie
    Galbus, Julia
    Conaway, Charles A.
    Title
    Writing to learn for scientific literacy : a rhetoric and composition studies-based curriculum for introductory historical geology
    Publication Date
    2017
    Author Degree Title
    Master of Arts in English
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    URI
    http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12419/325
    Abstract
    Scientific literacy is a primary goal of undergraduate introductory science education, and yet measures of this crucial pedagogical outcome among U.S. citizens indicate it is mediocre at best. Scientifically literate citizens sufficiently understand the concepts and the nature of science (NOS) -and can communicate that knowledge in writing -to actively participate in a global society grappling with issues such as climate change. However, many university students, both science majors and non-majors, lack understanding of the NOS and how to communicate science, leading to misconceptions that create barriers to scientific literacy. As an educational strategy to improve scientific literacy, Writing to Learn (WTL) is effective because it aligns with attributes of successful learning such as reinforcement, it encourages students to emulate the languaging processes of building scientific knowledge, and it also provides students with opportunities for the critical thinking, synthesis, and analysis needed for effectively engaging with and communicating science. To improve students' scientific communication skills and scientific literacy in the NOS, I developed a I0-step WTL curriculum for a I00-level historical geology course for majors and non-majors (N=22). Curriculum assignments include pre-curriculum writing, critical reading, in-class writing, instruction in argumentation, a research essay, structured peer review, revision plans, group work, and field presentations designed to emulate science epistemology. I evaluated pedagogical effectiveness by comparing the NOS literacy students exhibited in pre-curriculum writing with that exhibited in subsequent work, by analyzing the form and content of students' written arguments, and by surveying students at the end of the course. This thesis presents the results of these evaluative measures, describes each part of the curriculum and its theoretical underpinnings in science education research and composition studies, and discusses implications for future implementation and research. Results indicate that engaging students in the study of science through language arts-critical reading of and writing about scientific texts and the NOS-enhances the majority of students' scientific literacy. The epigenetic nature of writing as a process-its ability to shed light on a writer's evolution of thought-allows both the student and teacher to see improvements in understanding the NOS, and the ability to communicate that understanding.
    Description
    Thesis available in Rice Library University Archives and Special Collection.
    Collections
    Master of Arts in English (MAE)

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2022)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Contact Us
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.